Jump to content

Haywire

Members
  • Posts

    3
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Haywire

Haywire's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

  • First Post
  • Week One Done
  • One Month Later
  • One Year In

Recent Badges

0

Reputation

  1. In response to Uber’s (Zoidberg) comment on me in response to Predzee’s rant on the forums, this is a clear representation on staffs views on who should be a part of the staff team, for example, he judges all my chances of getting staff on an “impression” of me he gets from a sarcastic comment I made about my warnings “not counting” because they are from Aeyon, of course they are valid and of course they count (with some exceptions), it was pretty clear that it wasn’t a serious comment. This then leads him to “get the impression that he (me) will be going off at other staff causing issues” which is a false claim, as i don’t have anything against any of the staff on flux (even Aeyon). So, this is just a cheap excuse based of a sarcastic comment that hinders my chances of going for staff, which is exactly what Jack and Predzee talked about, where staff focuses so much on the past imperfections of individuals rather than the actual potential and knowledge they might have to become staff. Also, I’m sure this is the only dirt that staff has on my past issues, but this specific scenario brought up is all wrong. Which leads to my next argument, my past. Yeah, I understand my past on the server has been rough and I have done some dumb shit and made mistakes, but over the past 4-5 weeks I’ve been making things better for myself and clearing up my image somewhat, yet the staff cling on to those negative moments and hold it against those going for staff, like Uber bringing up a past event as a way to say I am not a good candidate for staff. So, imp basically saying that they are not entirely in the wrong to be judging if an individual is fit for staff for their mistakes in the past to an extent, but I believe that, with a serious shortage of staff, both active and in general, this shouldn’t be the main source of judgement on whether or not someone should be staff. (which is what Jack’s response talks about so im not going to brush over that any more than i need to, along with Predzee’s most recent post) This post is directed to the higher staff in hope that they take into consideration the points made in not only this post but other posts on this thread, on how they should go towards recruiting staff and the steps towards this.
×
×
  • Create New...